OSHA`s requirements are defined by laws, standards, and regulations. Our interpretive letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional obligations for employers. This letter represents OSHA`s interpretation of the requirements under discussion. Please note that our application guidelines may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. We also update our guidelines from time to time in response to new information. To stay informed of these developments, you can check out OSHA`s website at www.osha.gov. Rich Gardella is an investigative producer, journalist and digital journalist at NBC News Investigations based in Washington, D.C. Karen Kornegay of Louisiana filed one of the lawsuits. Their 19-year-old son, Dylan, died in 2010 after suffering severe burns to more than 80 percent of his body. When handling or using flammable or flammable liquids, the use of a safety housing without a flame arrester is treated as a de minimis violation.1 Question 2: Paragraph 1926.152(e) (Liquid Dispensers) specifies requirements for the dispensing and transfer of flammable or flammable liquids.
Does the requirement in section 1926.152(e)(2) that means of containment be electrically connected apply when a safe containing less than 5 gallons of gasoline is used to refuel a tool used on a construction project? Answer no. Section 1926.152(e)(2) states: A report by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which accompanied the original version of the bill in 2019, cited the findings of a 2013 NBC News investigation into portable plastic gasoline containers. Section 1926.152(e)(2) applies to the transshipment of fuel from one storage tank to another storage tank – not to transfers for end-use purposes (i.e., refuelling). Refuelling requirements are specified in § 1926.152 (f) (handling liquids at the point of end use) and (g) (service and refuelling areas). Sincerely, Russell B. Swanson, director of the building department A “flame penetrator” is a type of attenuation device, usually a piece of mesh or disc with holes designed to disturb the flame, used in “safety” metal gas cans, fuel tanks, and some containers of flammable liquids such as charcoal lighter liquids and even some alcohol bottles. NBC reported. More than 80 lawsuits have been filed in recent decades on behalf of plaintiffs who have claimed portable doses exploded and caused severe burns, some of which were fatal, NBC News reported. The law, signed on Sunday, includes a long timetable asking the CPSC to publish its final regulations “no later than 30 months” after the law`s effective date. It also includes an “exception” that requires the requirements of the “voluntary [industry] standard … be treated as a safety rule for consumer products” if the CPSC determines that they meet legal requirements. Another mother, Margrett Lewis of Sonoma, California, was a driving force behind the passage of the law.
The new law comes after a long struggle to force the container industry to add such equipment to plastic gas cans and other fuel tanks. Over the past few decades, more than 80 lawsuits filed on behalf of plaintiffs have alleged that portable gas cylinders exploded and caused severe burns, some of which were fatal. The PFCMA emphasized that consumers should never use gasoline to start or accelerate a fire. Kornegay was thrilled to learn that the design changes had become law. “If I could be speechless, I would be speechless because it`s something that weighs so heavily on my heart,” she said. “We remember all the children, adults and people to whom this happened.” These tests revealed that this was the case and concluded in 2016 that mitigation devices are “necessary” to combat possible explosions, and reported that some design prototypes for the devices had passed the safety, durability and operation tests. Lewis, who was contacted by phone this week, bluntly described her motivation. “I can`t let anyone else get burned,” she said.
A new law requires portable gas containers to be equipped with explosion protection devices A can of gas used to light a campfire reportedly exploded, spraying it with burning gasoline, NBC reported. Nbc News` 2013 investigation reported tests conducted by Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts with support from the gas cane industry — whether the portable plastic gas container was susceptible to flashback explosions. “I`m so happy,” he told NBC News in an editorial, “that the work we`ve done has now come into effect.” As a result of NBC News` investigation, WPI continued two more phases of testing, also with industry support, to determine whether flame retardants such as flame arresters could help prevent explosions. PFCMA said its member manufacturers began “introducing flame retardants for almost all of its PFCs about three years ago” in 2017. He said he “enthusiastically supports the new legislation as part of our members` unwavering focus on the safety of their products for consumers” and described the addition of flame retardant as “an additional safety measure for consumers who, despite a general knowledge of the risks, abuse gasoline to start or accelerate a fire.” But gasoline can be dangerous if not handled or stored properly. Gasoline should only be used for its intended purpose – as fuel – and stored only when absolutely necessary. It should not be used as a solvent, cleaner, grill starter or for any other purpose other than the engine. Until the new legislation was signed, there were no federal requirements for certain drinking water tanks. We reviewed the standard for the use of safety cans for flammable liquids on construction sites and found that the use of containers approved by the Department of Transportation (DOT) is consistent with the fundamental intent of the provisions of section 1926.152(a)(1). These gas cylinders are common household items and are generally not considered a hazard when used properly.
The Portable Fuel Container Manufacturers Association reported on this development on its website, noting that containers that meet the standard are “already produced.” Travis has partnered with spill containment products for PCI Products, AbsorbentsOnline.com for over 20 years. If you would like to know more about plant maintenance, absorbents, spill cleanup, spill containment or spill kits, contact me via absorbentsonline.com. 1According to OSHA`s de minimis policy, de minimis violations are those that are not directly or immediately related to safety or health. As a result, no quote will be issued. [back to text] While Kornegay acknowledges that her son shouldn`t have used a can of gasoline to start a campfire — as the container industry warns never to do — she told NBC News that she believes the container`s design was responsible for the severity of her injuries. The industry had already agreed on a new technical standard two years ago, at the end of 2018. A committee made up of industry representatives, consumer advocates and CPSC representatives established “performance requirements for flame retardants (FMDs) in portable fuel tanks”. “A flame extinguishing device shall be provided in each PFC opening to protect the opening or openings of the shell against the possible propagation of a flame in a fuel-air mixture inside the shell.” Another mother, Margrett Lewis of Sonoma, California, was a driving force behind the passage of the new law.
One of her twin daughters was badly burned when she and her sister tried to pour chimney fuel from a container without flame arresters into a fireplace without exhaust. A flashback explosion can occur when steam escaping from the box hits a flame or spark. The steam can ignite and “flashback” inside the box. The trial of Kornegay and others claimed that the containers were dangerous and defective, prone to “flashback” explosions because their designs did not include flame extinguishing devices. “It`s bittersweet,” Lewis said in the same press release. “This law, too late to save my daughter from the horrors of a burn unit, ensures that every year [thousands] are protected from tragic burns and death. I am so proud of her and her twin sister to move forward. January 29, 2004 Mr. Dennis Vance Dennis Vance, LLC 711 Low Gap Road Princeton, WV 24740 Re: 29 CFR 1926.152(a), (f) and (g); §1926.155(a) and (l); and Standard 3-4.1A Mr. Vance, This is in response to your letter dated July 31, 2003 to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
You ask about the requirements for storing and handling gasoline on a construction site at 29 CFR 1926.152.
